Maybe someone can explain why they think WOM restrictions are OK but f-count restrictions are not.
Lone R
melanie
dimension to the game. Guess what, putting an F count requirement on a box
at AQ is the same thing as having a WOM box you only give to those that XYZ.
No different. There will always be boxes out there that some people wont'
ever see the clues too. It's the way of life. I personally would rather
spend my time out chasing the boxes I DO have clues to then worry about the
ones I don't.
Happy Trails,
Maiden
_____
From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of funhog1
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 11:01 PM
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [LbNA] Re: I saw it coming
Add my name to those unqualified to find your letterboxes. Data entry
isn't my idea of a good time letterboxing. Funny that should label me
as one who doesnt' care about my hobby. Sigh... Funhog (boxing since 2001)
> I prefer to
> use Atlas Quest because it allows me to choose an F-count for the
people
> looking for boxes in the area (don't get me wrong, I enjoy LbNA as
well, but that
> one feature sways my listings). I feel that asking a letterboxer
to meet one
> of a few simple requirements helps to ensure that people who care
about the
> hobby are the ones who receive the clues. :o)
>
> Three Hearts
>
>
>
> _
> Click to signup for
> CFLLB Spring Gathering_
> (http://www.atlasque
st.com/events/signup.html?gEventId=317)
>
> 30 days to go...!
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
---------------------------------
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]